LUKE'S LEADERSHIP LESSON

When my son, Zak, was 10, we were on a soccer road trip with his teammate Luke, and they were talking over a fast-food lunch. This is what I overheard, “Hey, did I tell you that I was elected as the fourth-grade class executive?” Luke said.
 
“Man, you’re lucky. We don’t have class executives.” Zak was highly impressed.
 
I couldn’t resist joining in. “Luke what exactly does the fourth-grade class executive do? Do you run the fourth grade?” I asked.
 
Luke shook his head. “I don’t really run the fourth grade. My job is to go to dances and other school events and make sure all the fourth graders are happy.”
 
I could do nothing but laugh at Luke’s job description of an executive. At age ten, Luke saw his job as being responsible for the happiness of the entire fourth grade.
 
That point of view continues as we grow up and enter the workplace. Managers, executives and other leaders are expected to keep employees happy, build their morale, and find ways to motivate them.
 
We call this “caretaking” — trying to manage or take responsibility for another’s emotional response to a situation — and it typically shows up in two types of workplace conversations:


  • Conversations that attempt to reassure and protect

  • Conversations that prescribe and direct

In the face of difficult circumstances, we often hear managers say “Don’t’ worry, just keep doing your job. We’ll figure it out, everything will be OK.” This may seem compassionate, but such reassurances are debilitating in two ways:

  • It’s an attempt to impugn the other’s real experience.

  • It let’s the other off the hook for participating in resolving the problems at hand.

Being told everything will be OK might make sense when you’re 10, but as a response to an adult facing a difficult situation at work or in life, it has little relevance. In the harshest of lights, such reassurances are a lie — no one has a crystal ball when it comes to the future.
 
The other difficult issue is that when managers and leaders tell others not to worry the reaction may be  “OK I’ll just do my job and hope for the best.” In difficult times, is this the attitude needed from folks at work? Or would it be more productive if they were engaged, literate and facing the difficulty with resolve, perseverance, and optimism?
 
What’s a Leader to do?
 
Embrace
Take the other person seriously. Show understanding that their experience – whatever it is – is real for them and legitimate to them. Encourage conversation about doubts, reservations, concerns and fears. Realize the other is an adult.
 
Empathize
Take their side, out loud. Articulate their position so they know you understand it. Validate their experience and talk about your own anxiousness, concerns and fears about the situation. Don’t have any? Talk about your denial!
 
Engage
Talk directly and openly about the details of the situation. Answer questions fully and directly – no spin – don’t soften the blow. Make visible the choices people have about how they see the future. Maintain goodwill in your demeanor and tone.
 
Viktor Frankl writes in The Doctor and the Soul, “But the human being who sits opposite me at this table decides in every case what he ‘is’ during the next second, what he will say to me or conceal from me.”
 
We all choose what we make of a given situation, recognizing this is fundamental to true leadership and management.
 
Remembering this helps me remember I can’t make all the 4th graders happy.

DEEP CONVERSATIONS SIGNAL HAPPINESS

Researchers from University of Arizona, our (southern) backyard, have discovered that the kinds of conversations you have with others can be a good indication of whether you’re happy or not.

UA psychological scientists Matthias Mehl, Shannon Holleran, and Shelby Clark, along with Simine Vazire of Washington University in St. Louis, found that people who have meaningful conversations are more likely to be generally happy. Those who  reported high levels of well-being also tended to have conversations more frequently, according to the study that was published in the journal Psycological Science.

The conversations don’t have to be about existential angst, international affairs, or other weighty topics — but the researchers differentiated the substantial conversations that signal connection from those characterized by superficial small talk and light chatter that are found in many social situations, Mehl said.

How did they discover the link? They equipped 79 college students with recording devices, and then sifted through more than 23,000 conversation snippets that occurred  over four day’s time. The people who had scored happiest on psychological tests had twice as many meaningful conversations as the unhappiest.

While it doesn’t prove cause-and-effect, it’s an attention-getting connection that raises "the Interesting  possibility that happiness can be increased by facilitating substantive conversations," Mehl said.

We see it as one more indication of the importance of authentic conversations.

TAKING YOUR SIDE

A recent thread on our Authentic Conversations Facebook page addressed one of the conversations skills that people really struggle with. It began with this statement posted by Jamie:

“Here's a thought: Taking the other person's side demonstrates understanding and is the heart of collaboration.”

The first response to this posting came from a long-time, dear friend — a skilled and seasoned organization development consultant. He wrote:

 
“Hey Jamie. I have another thought. Listening to the other person's side is at the heart of collaboration. Not taking their side. Especially when you don't agree. If you take their side and don't agree you are just being in pretense! Just another thought!”

 

He raises one of the most common push backs that we hear when we talk with others about this concept. Our friend is right — if  ‘taking the other person’s side’ is done as a technique for winning the argument or getting your way, the pretense is the same as any other form of manipulation.

Here is why in the book and in our work we advocate stating — out loud — the other person’s point of view during a conversation:  

 

  • To deepen your understanding of their point of view, whether you agree with it or not

  • To demonstrate you are listening (you can't accurately restate if you didn't really hear it)

  • To give them the opportunity to feel truly understood

Doing this gives their point of the view the same validity as yours, and it doesn’t mean you have to agree with it. After taking their side you can then state say something like, "I have a different point of view that I’d like to share.” Or, "Here are some distinctions I want to draw."

Why are people reluctant to take the other side? It usually boils down to fears that doing so will:

 

  • Give your point of view more power than mine

  • Validate your position in a way that will keep my argument from prevailing

  • Lead to a conclusion that I actually do agree with you

These concerns have to do with wanting to win or be right, which are stone-cold barriers to collaboration. We suggest that if you feel strongly about prevailing, just state that upfront along with the rationale for your position. This way your intentions are clear.
 
Collaboration means caring as much about the good of the whole as I do about winning my position. Taking the other side is a powerful way to be collaborative in the moment.
 
Want to join our Facebook conversation? Check it out, we'd love to have your participation!

JOB CRAFTING AT 2 A.M.

Jamie often tells the story of the month in 1986 that he spent living in the Ronald McDonald House at Children’s Hospital in Detroit when his baby daughter, JR, was having up to 15 seizures a day. He is quick to credit the doctors and nurses for the excellent care they provided, but he remembers having an epiphany at 2 a.m., when adrenaline rushes and fear kept sleep away.

In June of 1985, JR had a 40-minute seizure after a DPT shot and incurred a permanent brain injury. Much of the “patient care” his daughter had received in the eight months since was delivered by the often “invisible” hospital workers — the lab technicians, the candy stripers, the environmental service workers, the kitchen staff, the nurses aides, the social workers. At 2 a.m., when he couldn’t find a diaper or something else he needed for JR, it was often the guy sweeping the hall or the woman cleaning the bathrooms that went out of their way to help him. They would bring what he needed to JR’s room, and then stay to chat with Jamie in a way that eased his mind for awhile.
Clearly this had a positive effect on Jamie and his family’s experience, but he remembers that these acts of service brought pleasure to the workers as well. And they happened every day. It is a beautiful example of job crafting, which is a relatively recent addition to the workplace vernacular. Although the term has been around for more than a decade, it appeared on our radar several times in the last several weeks. An article in Time magazine created a buzz in the blogosphere, including a couple by one of our favorite bloggers, CV Harquail on Authentic Organizations. She wrote about the phenomenon here and here. The latter post included the Pink Glove Dance video, which has been seen by more than 13,500 people in YouTube. When we saw the video, it reminded Jamie of his experience watching over JR so many years ago, and the people at the hospital who crafted their way into his heart.